User Tools

You are here: Welcome to ITRSS Wiki » ITRSS UM public wiki page » Getting Started with HPC » Hellbender

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
pub:hpc:hellbender [2025/03/24 18:08] – [Hardware] redmonppub:hpc:hellbender [2025/06/18 15:55] (current) – [GPU Node Lease] bjmfg8
Line 73: Line 73:
  
 ^ Service                              ^ Rate        ^ Unit         ^ Support        ^ ^ Service                              ^ Rate        ^ Unit         ^ Support        ^
-|Hellbender CPU Node* | $2,702.00 | Per Node/Year | Year to Year |+|Hellbender CPU Node | $2,702.00 | Per Node/Year | Year to Year |
 |Hellbender GPU Node* | $7,691.38 | Per Node/Year | Year to Year | |Hellbender GPU Node* | $7,691.38 | Per Node/Year | Year to Year |
 |RDE Storage: High Performance | $95.00 | Per TB/Year | Year to Year | |RDE Storage: High Performance | $95.00 | Per TB/Year | Year to Year |
 |RDE Storage: General Performance | $25.00 | Per TB/Year | Year to Year | |RDE Storage: General Performance | $25.00 | Per TB/Year | Year to Year |
  
-***Update 08/2024**: Additional priority partitions cannot be allocated at this time as both CPU and GPU investment has reached beyond the 50% threshold. If you require capacity beyond the general pool we are able to plan and work with your grant submissions to add additional capacity to Hellbender.+***Update 06/2025**: Additional GPU priority partitions cannot be allocated at this time as GPU investment has reached beyond the 50% threshold. If you require capacity beyond the general pool we are able to plan and work with your grant submissions to add additional capacity to Hellbender.
  
  
Line 119: Line 119:
 | Dell C6525 | 112    | 128        | 490 GB        | 1.6 TB          | 14336  | c001-c112  | | Dell C6525 | 112    | 128        | 490 GB        | 1.6 TB          | 14336  | c001-c112  |
  
-**The 2024 pricing is: $2,702 per node per year.**+**The 2025 pricing is: $2,702 per node per year.**
  
 ==== GPU Node Lease  ==== ==== GPU Node Lease  ====
Line 129: Line 129:
 | Dell R740xa | 17     | 64         | 238 GB        | A100 | 80 GB      | 4     | 1.6 TB        | 1088    | Dell R740xa | 17     | 64         | 238 GB        | A100 | 80 GB      | 4     | 1.6 TB        | 1088   
  
-**The 2024 pricing is: $7,692 per node per year.**+***Update 06/2025: Additional GPU priority partitions cannot be allocated at this time as GPU investment has reached beyond the 50% threshold. If you require capacity beyond the general pool we are able to plan and work with your grant submissions to add additional capacity to Hellbender** 
 + 
 +**The 2025 pricing is: $7,692 per node per year.**
  
 ==== Storage: Research Data Ecosystem ('RDE') ==== ==== Storage: Research Data Ecosystem ('RDE') ====
Line 138: Line 140:
   * Storage lab allocations are protected by associated security groups applied to the share, with group member access administered by the assigned PI or appointed representative.   * Storage lab allocations are protected by associated security groups applied to the share, with group member access administered by the assigned PI or appointed representative.
  
-**What is the Difference between High Performance and General Performance Storage?**+**What is the Difference between High Performance and General Performance Storage? **
  
 On Pixstor, which is used for standard HPC allocations, general storage is pinned to the SAS disk pool while high performance allocations are pinned to all flash NVME pool.  Meaning writes and recent reads will have lower latency with High performance allocations. On Pixstor, which is used for standard HPC allocations, general storage is pinned to the SAS disk pool while high performance allocations are pinned to all flash NVME pool.  Meaning writes and recent reads will have lower latency with High performance allocations.
Line 161: Line 163:
 **__None of the cluster attached storage available to users is backed up in any way by us__**, this means that if you delete something and don't have a copy somewhere else, it is gone. Please note the data stored on cluster attached storage is limited to Data Class 1 and 2 as defined by [[https://www.umsystem.edu/ums/is/infosec/classification-definitions| UM System DCL]]. If you have need to store things in DCL3 or DCL4 please contact us so we may find a solution for you. **__None of the cluster attached storage available to users is backed up in any way by us__**, this means that if you delete something and don't have a copy somewhere else, it is gone. Please note the data stored on cluster attached storage is limited to Data Class 1 and 2 as defined by [[https://www.umsystem.edu/ums/is/infosec/classification-definitions| UM System DCL]]. If you have need to store things in DCL3 or DCL4 please contact us so we may find a solution for you.
  
-**The 2024 pricing is: General Storage: $25/TB/Year, High Performance Storage: $95/TB/Year**+**The 2025 pricing is: General Storage: $25/TB/Year, High Performance Storage: $95/TB/Year**
  
 To order storage please fill out our [[https://missouri.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_6zkkwGYn0MGvMyO| RSS Services Order Form]] To order storage please fill out our [[https://missouri.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_6zkkwGYn0MGvMyO| RSS Services Order Form]]
Line 174: Line 176:
 **Costs** **Costs**
  
-The cost associated with using the RDE tape archive is $8/TB for short term data kept in inside the tape library for 1-3 years or $140 per tape rounded to the number of tapes for tapes sent offsite for long term retention up to 10 years. We send these tapes off to record management where they are stored in a climate-controlled environment. Each tape from the current generation LTO 9 holds approximately 18TB of data These are flat onetime costs and you have the option to do both a short term in library copy, and a longer-term offsite copy, or one or the other, providing flexibility.+The cost associated with using the RDE tape archive is $8/TB for short term data kept in inside the tape library for 1-3 years or $140 per tape rounded to the number of tapes for tapes sent offsite for long term retention up to 10 years. We send these tapes off to record management where they are stored in a climate-controlled environment. Each tape from the current generation LTO 9 holds approximately 18TB of data These are flat onetime costs, and you have the option to do both a short term in library copy, and a longer-term offsite copy, or one or the other, providing flexibility.
  
 **Request Process** **Request Process**
Line 180: Line 182:
 To utilize the tape archive functionality that RSS has setup, the data to be archived will need to be copied to RDE storage if it does not exist there already. This would require the following steps. To utilize the tape archive functionality that RSS has setup, the data to be archived will need to be copied to RDE storage if it does not exist there already. This would require the following steps.
   * Submit a RDE storage request if the data resides locally and a RDE share is not already available to the researcher: [[http://request.itrss.umsystem.edu|RSS Account Request Form]]   * Submit a RDE storage request if the data resides locally and a RDE share is not already available to the researcher: [[http://request.itrss.umsystem.edu|RSS Account Request Form]]
-  * Create an archive folder or folders in the relevant RDE storage share to hold the data you would like to archive. The folder(s) can be named to signify the contents, but we ask that the name includes _archive at then end. For example, something akin to: labname_projectx_archive_2024.+  * Create an archive folder or folders in the relevant RDE storage share to hold the data you would like to archive. The folder(s) can be named to signify the contents, but we ask that the name includes _archive at the end. For example, something akin to: labname_projectx_archive_2024.
   * Copy the contents to be archived to the newly created archive folder(s) within the RDE storage share.   * Copy the contents to be archived to the newly created archive folder(s) within the RDE storage share.
   * Submit a RDE tape Archive request: [[https://missouri.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_5o0NoDafJNzXnRY]]   * Submit a RDE tape Archive request: [[https://missouri.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_5o0NoDafJNzXnRY]]
-  * Once the tape archive jobs are completed ITRSS will notify you and send you a Archive job report after which you can delete the contents of the archive folder. +  * Once the tape archive jobs are completed ITRSS will notify you and send you an Archive job report after which you can delete the contents of the archive folder. 
-  * We request that subsequent archive jobs be added to a separate folder or the initial folder renamed to something that signifies the time of archive for easier retrieval *_archive2024, *archive2025, etc.+  * We request that subsequent archive jobs be added to a separate folder, or the initial folder renamed to something that signifies the time of archive for easier retrieval *_archive2024, *archive2025, etc.
  
 **Recovery** **Recovery**
Line 238: Line 240:
 ==== Software ==== ==== Software ====
  
-The Foundry was built and managed with Puppet. The underlying OS for the Foundry is Alma 8.9. For resource management and scheduling we are using SLURM Workload manager version 22.05.11+Hellbender was built and managed with Puppet. The underlying OS for the Hellbender is Alma 8.9. For resource management and scheduling we are using SLURM Workload manager version 22.05.11
  
 ==== Hardware ==== ==== Hardware ====
Line 260: Line 262:
 | Dell R640  | 32        | 40             | 364 GB            | Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz | 100 GB              | 1280      | c113-c145      | | Dell R640  | 32        | 40             | 364 GB            | Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz | 100 GB              | 1280      | c113-c145      |
 | Dell C6420 | 64        | 48             | 364 GB            | Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz | 1 TB                | 3072      | c146-c209      | | Dell C6420 | 64        | 48             | 364 GB            | Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz | 1 TB                | 3072      | c146-c209      |
-| Dell R6620 | 12        | 256            | 994 GB            | AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core Processor         | 1.5 TB              | 3072      | c210-c221      | +| Dell R6625 | 12        | 256            | 994 GB            | AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core Processor         | 1.5 TB              | 3072      | c210-c221      | 
-|            |           |                |                   |                                          | Total Cores         | 21760     |                |+| Dell R6625 | 2         | 256            | 6034 GB           | AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core Processor         | 1.6 TB              | 512       | c210-c221      | 
 +|            |           |                |                   |                                          | Total Cores         | 22272     | c222-c223      |
  
 === GPU nodes === === GPU nodes ===

Page Tools

IT Research Support Solutions Wiki

Site Tools